Find Supreme Court appeal cases here. The most recent cases are listed first. You can also use the search tool to find a specific case.
APPEALS ADDED IN THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT LISTED NEWEST TO OLDEST
The following statements of issues on appeal are prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. They have been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, some issues may not have been summarized.
Beginning on July 16, 2010, each appeal summary posted on this website includes its "posted" date, which is necessary for calculating certain due dates for filing briefs and motions under revised Rule 1:13-9, "Amicus Curiae."
In addition, website addresses cited in the Court's opinions may change or disappear over time. An attempt has been made to capture the material cited in an opinion and to provide links to those sources, when available.
A-45-14 Stephen Meehan v. Peter Antonellis, DMD (075265) Was plaintiff’s dental malpractice action properly dismissed for failure to comply with the Affidavit of Merit statute (N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-26 to -29)?
Watch the
|
A-44-14 Alexander Bardis v. Kitty Stinson (075208) Where plaintiffs’ general liability and commercial dwelling insurance provided coverage for collapse resulting from “hidden decay," among other losses, was damage caused by the collapse of plaintiffs’ basement wall covered under the circumstances presented?
Watch the
|
A-43-14 Globe Motor Company v. Ilya Igdalev (074996) In the context of this action asserting that defendants breached the parties’ settlement agreement, were plaintiffs entitled to summary judgment under the circumstances presented?
Watch the
|
A-42-14 State v. James Denelsbeck (075170) Was this defendant, who is charged with a fourth offense of driving while intoxicated (DWI), entitled to a jury trial because of the aggregate penalties that he faced?
Watch the
|
A-41-14 Roy Steinberg v. Sahara Sam’s Oasis, LLC (075294) Was the waiver of liability signed by plaintiff invalid because of the defendant-amusement park’s gross negligence or because defendant violated the New Jersey Carnival-Amusement Rides Safety Act, N.J.S.A. 5:3-31 to -59?
Watch the
|
A-40-14 E & J Equities v. Board of Adjustment of the Township of Franklin (075207) Was this municipal ordinance banning digital billboards constitutional and was the municipality’s denial of plaintiff’s application for a variance for such a billboard valid?
Watch the
|
A-39-14 State v. Lixandra Hernandez and Jose Sanchez (075444) In this criminal case where the State’s primary evidence is the testimony of a confidential cooperating witness, is defendant entitled to information regarding that witness’s cooperation with the State in connection with other, non-related criminal cases?
Watch the
|
A-38-14 Salvatore Puglia v. Elk Pipeline, Inc. (075171) Are plaintiff’s Conscientious Employee Protection Act claims preempted by federal law because they required interpretation and analysis of the terms of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement?
Watch the
|
A-36/37-14 Northwest Bergen County Utilities Authority v. Kathleen A. Donovan (075060) Was the County Executive authorized to veto the minutes of the Utilities Authority’s meeting, which provided for a stipend and health benefits for the Authority’s commissioners; and was the County Executive authorized to terminate the commissioners?
Watch the
|
A-35-14 IMO the Imposition of Probation on Eastwick College LPN to RN Bridge Program (074772) Did the State Board of Nursing properly interpret and apply the term “graduating class," N.J.A.C. 13:37-1.3(c)(2), under the circumstances presented?
Watch the
|
A-34-14 State v. Bobby Perry a/k/a Bobby Penny (075114) Did the trial court properly apply New Jersey's Rape Shield Law, N.J.S.A. 2C:2014-7, to exclude evidence proffered by defendant regarding the victim’s sexual conduct with an unknown third party?
Watch the
|
A-33-14 Karon K. Johnson v. Roselle EZ Quick, LLC (075044) Does the 2011 amendment to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (No-Fault Law) apply under the circumstances presented, such that this insurer is barred from seeking reimbursement for paid personal injury protection (PIP) benefits?
Watch the
|
A-32-14 Tonique Griffin v. City of East Orange (074937) Did the trial court err in barring the testimony of a witness who claimed that her superiors directed her to lie to the person investigating plaintiffs’ claims of sexual harassment?
Watch the
|
A-31-14 Annemarie Morgan v. Sanford Brown Institute (075074) Under the terms of this arbitration agreement, can plaintiffs be compelled to arbitrate all claims related to their enrollment agreements, including their Consumer Fraud Act claims?
Watch the
|
A-30-14 Ramon Cuevas v. Wentworth Group (075077) Did the trial court err in denying defendants’ request for remittitur under the circumstances presented?
Watch the
|
A-29-14 State v. Lee Funderburg (074760) In the context of this jury trial for first-degree attempted murder, should the trial judge have charged the jury, sua sponte, on the lesser-included offense of attempted passion/provocation manslaughter?
Watch the
|
A-28-14 Christina Silviera-Francisco v. Board of Education of Elizabeth (074974) Did the Appellate Division err in determining that, in appealing a decision of the Commissioner of Education, the Board of Education was precluded from challenging a prior decision of the Commissioner that had remanded the matter to the Administrative Law Judge?
Watch the
|
A-27-14 Sergio Rodriguez v. Raymours Furniture (074603) Could the employer enforce a contractual provision in an employment application, by which the employee waived the two-year statute of limitations applicable to claims against the employer and shortened the period for such claims to six months?
Watch the
|
A-26-14 State v. Robert J. Stein (074466) Did the State improperly deny the defendant discovery to contest the charge of driving while intoxicated?
Watch the
|
A-25-14 Patricia Del Vecchio v. Township of Bridgewater (074936) In this action alleging that the defendant-employer failed to provide a reasonable accommodation for the plaintiff-employee’s disability in violation of the Law Against Discrimination, did the trial court improperly limit the testimony of the employee’s treating physicians regarding her medical condition?
Watch the
|