Find Supreme Court appeal cases here. The most recent cases are listed first. You can also use the search tool to find a specific case.
APPEALS ADDED IN THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT LISTED NEWEST TO OLDEST
The following statements of issues on appeal are prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. They have been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, some issues may not have been summarized.
Beginning on July 16, 2010, each appeal summary posted on this website includes its "posted" date, which is necessary for calculating certain due dates for filing briefs and motions under revised Rule 1:13-9, "Amicus Curiae."
In addition, website addresses cited in the Court's opinions may change or disappear over time. An attempt has been made to capture the material cited in an opinion and to provide links to those sources, when available.
|
A-52-16 State v. Dorian Pressley a/k/a Justin Belton (078747) Was the undercover officer’s identification of defendant impermissibly suggestive, such that defendant was entitled to a Wade hearing, where the officer identified defendant from a single photograph within one hour of the undercover transaction?
Watch the
|
|
A-51-16 State v. Gary Twiggs (077686) When addressing the statute of limitations in a criminal matter, is N.J.S.A. 2C:1-6’s tolling provision – which applies when "the actor" is identified by means of DNA evidence – triggered where the DNA analyzed belongs to a third party, rather than the defendant?
Watch the
|
|
A-50-16 State v. J.L.G. a/k/a J.L.J. (078718) Was defendant entitled to a new trial because of the admission of expert testimony regarding the child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome? [Note: This appeal is remanded summarily to the trial court for a hearing, pursuant to N.J.R.E. 104, to determine whether CSAAS evidence meets the reliability standard of N.J.R.E. 702, in light of recent scientific evidence. Any party seeking to appear as amicus curiae and to participate in the development of the record may move before the trial court within 30 days of 3/17/17. The trial court shall determine the extent of such participation. Jurisdiction of the appeal is otherwise retained.]
Watch the
|
|
A-49-16 State v. Allen Alexander a/k/a Karon Keenan (078515) In this trial on charges of robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery, did the trial court commit plain error by failing to charge the jury on the crime of second-degree aggravated assault as a lesser-included offense?
Watch the
|
|
A-48-16 Mary Harz v. Borough of Spring Lake (078711) Could plaintiff maintain a cause of action against defendants under the Civil Rights Act for defendants’ failure to properly review her complaints about alleged zoning violations?
Watch the
|
|
A-47-16 Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. Civil Service Commission (078742) Among other issues, what is the appropriate standard of review applicable when a court reviews the Legislature’s invocation of its veto power, pursuant to the Legislative Review Clause (N.J. Const. art. V, § 4, ¶ 6)?
Watch the
|
|
A-43/44/45/46-16 Agriculture Development Committee v. Quaker Valley Farms, LLC (078517) Did defendants’ earth-moving activities on their farm violate the terms of the development easement granted by their predecessors in title under the Agriculture Retention and Development Act?
Watch the
|
|
A-42-16 State v. Aharon Atwood and Shalom Mizrahi (078804) Was the seized evidence properly suppressed based on defendant’s challenge to police conduct occurring prior to the issuance of a warrant?
Watch the
|
|
A-41-16 State v. Shayna Zalcberg (078308) In this DWI matter, is defendant entitled to the suppression of blood evidence obtained without a warrant?
Watch the
|
|
A-40-16 State v. Habeeb Robinson (078900) What is the scope of the discovery that the State must produce prior to a pretrial detention hearing held under the Bail Reform Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 2A:162-15 to -26? [Note: This appeal has been accelerated by order of the Court and will be calendared for oral argument on a peremptory date to be scheduled by the Clerk’s Office. Should any entity wish to file a motion to participate as amicus curiae, the motion and any proposed brief must be served and filed on or before noon on 2/27/17. The State and the defendant may file answers to any such amicus motion, together with a proposed response brief to the amicus brief, on or before noon on 3/7/17. No further submissions shall be accepted unless requested by the Court.]
Watch the
|
|
A-39-16 Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. Asher Adelman (078597) In this defamation action, did posting an article on a website with minor changes from the original posting constitute a separate publication, thereby triggering a new statute of limitations, or did the single publication rule apply to render the complaint untimely?
Watch the
|
|
A-38-16 State in the Interest of J.A., a Juvenile (077383) Did exigent circumstances justify the officers’ warrantless entry in the juvenile’s home, where the officers tracked him by following the GPS signals emitted from the victim’s stolen phone?
Watch the
|
|
A-37-16 State v. Malcolm C. Hagans (078014) Was consent to search the vehicle freely and voluntarily given, under the circumstances presented?
Watch the
|
|
A-36-16 State v. Lori A. Hummel (078476) Based on defendant’s statement, were the officers’ justified in removing all of the items in defendant’s purse in her presence, before removing the purse from the interrogation room?
Watch the
|
|
A-35-16 Margo S. Ardan v. Board of Review, Department of Labor and Workforce Development (077771) Was this individual disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because she left her employment at Lourdes Medical Center of Burlington County, Inc. without good cause attributable to the work?
Watch the
|
|
A-33/34-16 State v. Nathan N. Shaw; State v. Keon L. Bolden (078247) Was the statement uttered by defendant while detained in a police vehicle the result of an unlawful detention; and, under the circumstances presented, must defendant show a protected privacy interest in the tote bag where drug evidence was found?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-33/34-16-Reargued
|
|
A-31/32-16 John Giovanni Granata v. Edward F. Broderick, Jr. (078207) Among other issues, can an attorney’s pledge of anticipated counsel fees be considered a security interest under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code?
Watch the
|
|
In this action concerning defendant’s implementation of the OMNIA two-tiered provider network, may defendant redact certain information as confidential and proprietary before producing documents in discovery? [Note: This appeal has been accelerated by order of the Court dated 4/13/17. Any motion for leave to appear amicus curiae shall be served and filed with the proposed amicus brief on or before 5/5/17, and any answer shall be served and filed with the proposed brief in response on or before 5/19/17. The matter shall be scheduled for argument on June 20, 2017.]
Watch the
|
|
A-28-16 State v. Tormu E. Prall (078169) In this trial for murder and arson, did the trial court err in admitting testimony about defendant's prior threats and in its handling of testimony concerning the victim's belief that defendant started the fire?
Watch the
|
|
A-27-16 New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. A.B. (077664) Did defendant abuse or neglect her sixteen-year-old daughter by refusing to permit her daughter to live in the family home after she ran away?
Watch the
|