Supreme Court Appeal
Case Details:
Was defendant’s statement to police obtained voluntarily where officers suggested that defendant would receive counseling and would not be jailed if he spoke with them; and, should one victim’s out-of-court identification have been suppressed for failure to comply with the recording requirements of Rule 3:11 and the principles established in State v. Delgado, 188 N.J. 48 (2006)?
Case Dates:
- Certification granted: March 26, 2018
- Posted: March 27, 2018
- Argued: March 11, 2019
- Decided: July 22, 2019
Audio for A-59-17