Supreme Court Appeal
Case Details:
Were the officers required to advise defendant, who was not charged with any offenses at the time, why he was arrested before proceeding with the custodial interrogation, and was the victim’s out-of-court identification of defendant admissible where the victim did not testify at trial?
Case Dates:
- Appeal as of right (Appellate Division dissent) and certification granted: April 16, 2021
- Posted: April 16, 2021
- Argued: Oct. 12, 2021
- Decided: March 16, 2022
Case Notes:
[Note: This matter has been accelerated by order of the Court, and a peremptory briefing schedule is imposed. Any motion for leave to appear as amicus curiae shall be served and filed with the proposed amicus brief on or before 6/7/2021. Such filings should be submitted to the Clerk’s Office through eCourts Supreme. For information about submitting an amicus filing, please call the Clerk’s Office at 609-815-2955. No further submissions shall be accepted unless requested by the Court.]Audio for Part 1
Audio for Part 2