Supreme Court Appeal
Case Details:
Was the undercover officer’s identification of defendant impermissibly suggestive, such that defendant was entitled to a Wade hearing, where the officer identified defendant from a single photograph within one hour of the undercover transaction?
Case Dates:
- Certification granted: March 23, 2017
- Posted: March 24, 2017
- Argued: Jan. 30, 2018
- Decided: April 19, 2018