A-35/36-18 State v. Roger Covil (081267)
Among other issues, do the Court’s holdings in State v. Simms, 224 N.J. 393 (2016) and State v. Cain, 224 N.J. 410 (2016), concerning the permissible scope of expert testimony in drug cases, apply retroactively to cases in the pipeline; and may the State, in an ongoing criminal matter, use a defendant’s answer from a civil forfeiture matter when the defendant was not warned that the answer might be used in the criminal prosecution?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-35/36-18
- Certification granted : Dec. 18, 2018
- Posted: Dec. 18, 2018
- Argued: Sept. 9, 2019
- Decided: Jan. 22, 2020