Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

A-24-14

A-24-14 State v. Hector Feliciano (074395)

Does the roving warrant provision of the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-9(g), which allows the police to wiretap telephones not identified in the warrant application on a showing that the target has purposefully attempted to thwart interception by changing telephones, violate the particularity requirements of the New Jersey and federal constitutions?

Watch the 
  • Certification granted : Nov. 14, 2014
  • Posted: Nov. 14, 2014
  • Argued: Dec. 2, 2015
  • Decided: March 9, 2016