A-23-22 State v. Quintin D. Watson (087251)
Was it harmless error to admit the police officer’s testimony that he consulted with another police department before filing criminal charges against defendant, did the officer’s testimony narrating a surveillance video deprive defendant of a fair trial, and was it plain error to allow the victim to identify defendant for the first time in-court during the trial when the victim previously had identified a different individual as the perpetrator during a photo array?
[Note: The Court imposed a peremptory briefing schedule in this matter. Any motion for leave to appear as amicus curiae shall be served and filed, with the proposed amicus brief, on or before 2/9/23. Such filings shall be submitted to the Clerk’s Office through eCourts Supreme. For information about submitting an amicus filing, please call the Clerk’s Office at (609)815-2955. No further submissions shall be accepted unless requested by the Court.]
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-23-22 Part-1
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-23-22 Part-2
- Certification Granted : Nov. 18, 2022
- Posted: Nov. 18, 2022
- Argued: March 27, 2023
- Decided: Aug. 2, 2023