Supreme Court Appeal
Case Details:
Was it harmless error to admit the police officer’s testimony that he consulted with another police department before filing criminal charges against defendant, did the officer’s testimony narrating a surveillance video deprive defendant of a fair trial, and was it plain error to allow the victim to identify defendant for the first time in-court during the trial when the victim previously had identified a different individual as the perpetrator during a photo array?
Case Dates:
- Certification Granted: Nov. 18, 2022
- Posted: Nov. 18, 2022
- Argued: March 27, 2023
- Decided: Aug. 2, 2023
Case Notes:
[Note: The Court imposed a peremptory briefing schedule in this matter. Any motion for leave to appear as amicus curiae shall be served and filed, with the proposed amicus brief, on or before 2/9/23. Such filings shall be submitted to the Clerk’s Office through eCourts Supreme. For information about submitting an amicus filing, please call the Clerk’s Office at (609)815-2955. No further submissions shall be accepted unless requested by the Court.]Audio for A-23-22 Part-1
Audio for A-23-22 Part-2