Find Supreme Court appeal cases here. The most recent cases are listed first. You can also use the search tool to find a specific case.
APPEALS ADDED IN THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT LISTED NEWEST TO OLDEST
The following statements of issues on appeal are prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. They have been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, some issues may not have been summarized.
Beginning on July 16, 2010, each appeal summary posted on this website includes its "posted" date, which is necessary for calculating certain due dates for filing briefs and motions under revised Rule 1:13-9, "Amicus Curiae."
In addition, website addresses cited in the Court's opinions may change or disappear over time. An attempt has been made to capture the material cited in an opinion and to provide links to those sources, when available.
|
A-23-20 Armando Rios, Jr. v. Meda Pharmaceutical, Inc. (084746) In this action in which plaintiff asserted that his supervisor’s use of racial slurs on two occasions created a hostile work environment in violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, were there material issues of fact that precluded the grant of summary judgment to defendants?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-23-20
|
|
A-22-20 State v. Tywaun S. Hedgespeth (084892) Was it harmless error for the trial court to determine that defendant’s prior convictions could be used to impeach him under N.J.R.E. 609 where that determination resulted in defendant’s decision not to testify, and did the admission of an affidavit certifying the nonexistence of a gun permit without testimony by the affiant violate the Confrontation Clause?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-22-20
|
|
A-21-20 State v. Michael Konecny (084880) Can a defendant’s past uncounseled convictions for driving while intoxicated (DWI) support a conviction under N.J.S.A. 2C:40-26(b), which prohibits driving during a period of license suspension imposed following a second or subsequent conviction for DWI?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-21-20
|
|
A-20-20 State v. Laquan Harris (084631) In this post-conviction relief proceeding, did defendant show that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel entitling him to a new trial?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-20-20
|
|
A-19-20 Estate of Hiram A. Gonzalez v. The City of Jersey City (084381) Were the actions of the police officers ministerial in nature such that they were not immune from liability under the Tort Claims Act?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
Part 1
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
Part 2
|
|
A-18-20 Baffi Simmons v. Wendy Mercado (084695) Are complaints and summonses in the State’s Electronic Complaint Disposition Record (ECDR) system subject to production under the Open Public Records Act?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-18-20
|
|
A-17-20 Bonay Goldhagen v. Susan Pasmowitz (084668) Does the strict liability dog bite statute, N.J.S.A. 4:19-16, have an assumption of the risk exception for independent contractors?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-17-20
|
|
A-15/16-20 State v. Bennie Anderson (084365) Was the forfeiture of this public employee’s pension a fine that implicates the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Paragraph 12 of the New Jersey Constitution, and if so, what factors should courts consider when assessing whether pension forfeiture is excessive?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-15/16-20
|
|
A-14-20 State v. Jose Carrion (084390) Did the failure of the arresting officers to apprise defendant of his Miranda rights prior to his initial statements in his apartment preclude the admission of his subsequent warned statements at the police station; and did the admission of an affidavit certifying the nonexistence of a gun permit without testimony by the affiant violate the Confrontation Clause?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-14-20
|
|
A-13-20 State v. Michelle Paden-Battle (084603) Did the jury’s verdict acquitting defendant of murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and weapons offenses preclude the sentencing court from finding that defendant ordered the victim’s execution?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-13-20
|
|
A-12-20 Ernest Bozzi v. City of Jersey City (084392) Under the Open Public Records Act, was plaintiff entitled to the names and addresses of individuals possessing a dog license issued by Jersey City?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-12-20
|
|
A-11-20 State v. Rasheem W. McQueen and Myshira T. Allen-Brewer (084564) Did the State’s acquisition of the recording of a telephone call placed from the police station’s phone violate the Fourth Amendment?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-11-20
|
|
A-10-20 Borough of Carteret v. Firefighters Mutual Benevolent Association, Local 67 (084709) Was the arbitrator’s interpretation of the disputed clause in the parties’ collective negotiations agreement reasonably debatable?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
Part 1
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
Part 2
|
|
A-9-20 State v. Juan C. Molchor; State v. Jose A. Rios (084694) Under the Criminal Justice Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:162-15 to -26, can a defendant’s immigration status form the basis for the court’s pretrial detention decision? [Note: This matter has been accelerated by order of the Court, and a peremptory briefing schedule is imposed. Any motion for leave to appear as amicus curiae shall be served and filed with the proposed amicus brief on or before 10/30/2020. Such filings should be sent to the Clerk’s Office by email. For information about submitting an amicus filing, please call the Clerk’s Office at 609-815-2955 No further submissions shall be accepted unless requested by the Court.]
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
Part 1
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
Part 2
|
|
A-8-20 State v. Oscar Lopez-Carrera (084750) Under the Criminal Justice Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:162-15 to -26, can a court consider the issuance of a Final Removal Order when deciding whether to detain the defendant? [Note: This matter has been accelerated by order of the Court, and a peremptory briefing schedule is imposed. Any motion for leave to appear as amicus curiae shall be served and filed with the proposed amicus brief on or before 10/30/2020. Such filings should be sent to the Clerk’s Office by email. For information about submitting an amicus filing, please call the Clerk’s Office at 609-815-2955. No further submissions shall be accepted unless requested by the Court.]
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
Part 1
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
Part 2
|
|
A-7-20 State v. Cynthia Rivera (084419) Was the sentencing court’s finding and weighing of the aggravating and mitigating factors based on sufficient, credible evidence in the record and did the court adequately explain its reasoning?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-7-20
|
|
A-6-20 State v. Edwin Andujar (084167) Was defendant’s conviction properly reversed where the State ran a criminal background check on a minority member of the jury pool after it unsuccessfully sought to remove the prospective juror for cause?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
Part 1
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
Part 2
|
|
A-5-20 Shelley Pritchett v. State of New Jersey (084451) Was the punitive damages award against a public entity reasonable and proportional?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-5-20
|
|
A-4-20 Angel Alberto Pareja v. Princeton International Properties (084394) Does a commercial landowner have a duty to take reasonable steps to render a public walkway abutting its property—covered by snow or ice—reasonably safe, while precipitation is falling?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-4-20
|
|
A-3-20 Leah Coleman v. Sonia Martinez (084489) Was it foreseeable that defendant’s client would commit an act of violence against plaintiff, such that defendant had a duty to take reasonable steps to avoid exposing plaintiff to danger posed by the client?
Watch the
Listen to the
Oral Argument Audio for
A-3-20
|